PragerU Live: New York Post Columnist Naomi Riley (4/25/17)

PragerU
795 followers
12 Video Views·Apr 16, 2025
We’re LIVE with New York Post columnist Naomi Riley, discussing American Indians, and how the politicians in Washington, D.C. (and NOT the @Washington Redskins) are the culprit behind the many huge problems facing American Indians.
Consider a donation to PragerU, because PragerU is a nonprofit and relies on donations from viewers like you!
DONATE -- http://l.prageru.com/2oRDYjL
hey everyone I'm Elicia Krauss here once
again at the Prager U Q with another
great Facebook live for you this week
featuring our presenter of this week's
video Naomi Riley She's a New York Post
columnist and author of the new book the
new trail of teers and her new video is
up on prageru.com of course and you can
watch it here on Facebook as well
American Indians are still getting a raw
deal and it has over 600,000 views since
it's released yesterday Naomi thanks so
much for being with us today thanks for
having me we really appreciate it I
found your video incredibly fascinating
I'm from the land of the red people
which I guess is Politically Incorrect
to say Oklahoma so I grew up with a lot
of Native Americans have Native
Americans in my family have Native
American Heritage and uh I think that
this is an issue that a lot of people
are kind of aware of but not really
educated about so I love this video that
you brought us for Brer you this week
thanks for doing that but most people
assume that the government's history of
hurting American Indians was back during
the time of Andrew Jackson you know
Trail of Tears and that we've made
things right by giving them reservations
and all of these government benefits
billions of dollars of which you talked
about in your video this week but did
you find what did you find in the
process I guess of writing your book the
new Trail of Tears have we really helped
them and benefited them in any way well
I think you're right that most Americans
are really not educated about these
issues beyond what we learn in second or
third grade about American Indian
policies 100 or 150 years ago um in fact
of course as everybody may recall the
reservations were a way of pushing the
Indians out of the way um so that we
could pursue western expansion um but
somehow the reservations now have
morphed into a policy that we somehow
view as protective of their interests uh
that these are reservations where white
people can't destroy their land in fact
the reservations are a purely
paternalistic policy whereby we restrict
the rights of American Indians
particularly their economic rights and
their property rights um what a
reservation means is that the land is
held in trust by the federal government
um as I say in the video and in the book
the only other people that we hold
things in trust for legally are children
and the mentally incompetent so I think
that tells you just about where we are
in terms of our views of American
Indians today and our policies um but
what that means in effect uh that we
hold this land in trust it means that
American Indians cannot buy it or sell
it or use it as capital in order to make
investments um they simply don't have
the same kind of property rights and
economic freedoms that other Americans
do so how big of a problem for American
Indians are the names of these sports
teams that we always hear about in the
news uh the Washington Redskins or Chief
Wahoo mascot for the Cleveland
Indians so um as I as I talk about a lot
in the book uh the the indicators uh the
social and economic indicators for
American Indians are pretty horrendous
um they are the most impoverished group
in the country um they have uh higher
rates of of child abuse of domestic
abuse of alcoholism of suicide um of of
violence even gang violence than any
other racial group in the country um and
a lot of this really does stem from uh
the economic problems that they have um
unfortunately I think a lot of our
conversations about Native Americans
this country have really focused on uh
these debates over political correctness
whether they be um you know team names
or or other uh you know people are
offended by Columbus Day or you know or
Thanksgiving in some cases um but
honestly you know these are not the
issues that are really hurting American
Indians in these communities today I
mean if if you had uh you know if you
had the highest suicide rate of any
racial group in the country you know you
would not be sitting around worrying
about what the Washington you know DC
residents call their football team uh so
the federal government as your points
out spends billions of dollars and has
thousands of employees a year focused on
serving or they're supposed to be
serving American Indians do you think
that it's helping make their lives any
better I think it's really making their
lives a lot worse and um a lot of
American Indians will tell you this I
mean I went to a bunch of reservations
for this book and I interviewed a lot of
American Indians on the ground and none
of them are particularly happy with the
way they are treated by the Bureau of
Indian Affairs for for instance um as I
say the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the
Bureau of Indian education have 9,000
employees among them um and that's about
one employee for every 110 residents on
a reservation and they're really
micromanaged like children in some ways
I mean the the I talked to one American
in just to give you an example I was on
the Northern Cheyenne reservation and I
spoke to a man who basically wanted to
uh buy a very small piece of land to
raise some of his cattle on um and he
wanted to purchase it from his neighbor
who was another American Indian and they
had spoken and the two of them had
agreed on the price for this small
parcel of land again just a few acres
and then um a Bureau of Indian Affairs
representative came in and said no you
can't do that because we don't think
that that's fair market value for the
land now of course in any other uh you
know real world situation fa market
value is what people pay for the land
it's not some madeup number in
Washington DC by some bureaucrat but on
Indian reservations that's what it is
and the the particularly cruel irony of
this situation is that this number had
been made up because the Bureau of
Indian Affairs had recently had the land
appraised for a kind of buyback program
they were doing and they specifically
told the appraiser to make the appraisal
high so is quote not to screw over the
Indians wow and it screwed over at least
two Indians circum fre time so can you
explain because the land analogy there
the story that you just shared can you
explain the idea of land trusts and how
American Indians really don't have total
property rights if they own land on a
reservation right so this is um there's
a you know famous economist named
Hernando doto and he he referred to this
as dead Capital um you know if a lot of
Americans obviously uh you know they
want to purchase a house they go to a
bank and they get a mortgage and if they
for if they don't pay their mortgage
payments the bank can foreclose on the
house and the piece of land that they've
tried to buy but if American Indian goes
to a bank they can't get the same deal
because the bank could never foreclose
on the property because a bank cannot
own reservation land and this affects
people not only in terms of mortgages
and by the way the housing situation on
these reservations is perfectly
horrendous I mean you have people
squeezing you know 15 people into a
trailer home because they can't afford a
mortgage and you have these vast
hundreds of thousands of empty acres and
you have a housing shortage like it's
Manhattan um but but more to the more
the one of the bigger problems though is
that American Indians also can't use
that land then in order to start a small
business um a lot of Americans when they
want to start a business they use the
collateral from their homes um in order
to to borrow against it in order to
start up a business but American Indians
again they don't have access to that
even though all the all other Americans
do so do you believe that the
reservation system was maybe set up with
good intentions because it
seems that's the amazing thing the
reservation system was set up with
terrible intentions it was set up with
the intention of kind of warehousing
these people but somehow we have sort of
turned it into this thing where we're
suggesting that now it has good
intentions that now we're using it to
protect them but in fact we're not
protecting them and it goes by the way
it goes far Beyond economics not only
are we denying them economic rights but
as I talk about in my book we Are
denying them a decent education they
have a terrible Health Care system and
all of this is on the federal government
we have no one to blame but the people
in Washington we are even denying them
proper constitutional protections
American Indians on reservations are
victims of crimes at just astronomical
rates and it is because of overlapping
jurisdictions and problems with you know
tribal courts giving American Indians
their proper rights um that that the
rights of American Indians who are I
should emphasize full American citizens
are not being protected so is there any
way to turn I guess the current
reservation system or the way the
federal government handles the American
Indian Community around or do we just
need to cut it off completely well the
most interesting trip that I took for my
book was to Canada actually and they
have a similar situation up there they
call it the Reserve System instead of
reservations um but a number of the
First Nations there have been pushing
something through the Canadian
Parliament called the first nation's
property ownership act which would
basically give tribes underlying title
to the land so they would be like you
know the city of Boston so even if
American Indians bought and sold the
land among themselves um the the land
would not you know the the the ultimate
title to it would be held by the tribe
not by the national government and I
think one of the things that's nice
about the First Nations prop property
ownership Act is that tribes can
actually opt into it so you know if
you're a tribe that believes you know
you want totally communal property and
you want the federal government to be
protecting your land and be in charge of
it at all costs you know so be it you
can stick with what you have but if you
are you know someone who is uh you know
Native American and you really want your
community to be able to experience the
kind of economic growth that comes from
having property rights you can opt into
this legislation and it would be great
to see something like that here as well
so final question and on an entirely
different topic I really loved your
piece this week and aulter about the
dangers of helicopter parenting you
specifically talked about the scenario
at the playground I have a three and a
halfy old and I'm six months pregnant
with kid number two and I'm sure you
know like La is this Mecca of helicopter
parents or and then the worst ones are
the helicopter parents with the nannies
too anyway but I was wondering if you
have any thoughts as to whether
Millennials could or should learn some
valuable parenting lessons from their
grandparents parents
Generation Well they absolutely should
um you know what prompted the piece I
think was uh an Hathaway acknowledged
that she had been uh sliding down a
slide with her one-year-old and you know
doctors will even tell you that this is
dangerous because if you you know a 150
pound person is sitting behind you know
a one-year-old on a slide gravity takes
over and you get a lot of broken bones
like this um so it's I think on a very
practical level this shows you what the
dangers of helicopter parenting are but
in terms of Millennials I mean you know
a lot of people are pointing to this
kind of behavior as the reason that
we're seeing this you know snowflake
culture on college campuses now that
these people have been hovered over and
babied and overscheduled their whole
lives um so yes I mean I really would
like you know uh young people who are
parenting today to kind of think like
well you know what kind of kid would I
like would I like a kid you know who's
independent who is able to go down a
slide by themselves um you know who who
is able to experience the outdoors who
is able to you know find things for
themselves and walk to the park by
themselves and you know I think that's
one of the reasons why you know the kind
of freerange parenting movement is
gathering steam because people are
looking at this and thinking you know
maybe it's not the best thing for my
children to be sort of raised in this
hot house
environment well thank you for that
piece it was really great and everyone
should be sure to watch Naomi's latest
prageru video it's pinned to the our
Facebook page right here R prayer you
Facebook page and go to Amazon and get
her book the new Trail of Tears Naomi
thank you so much for your time today
and thanks for this great video for us
thank you have a great
day
