Fully Restoring U.S.-Taiwan Diplomacy: The Ultimate Card Against China

Just Strange
239 followers
#Trump #Elon #muskurane
Could the U.S. and Taiwan soon restore full diplomatic ties, igniting a seismic shift in the Indo-Pacific? As tensions with China soar, Taiwan stands as the linchpin of global tech and security. With Trump’s bold vision and Congress uniting behind historic bills, is this the ultimate card to counter Beijing’s ambitions?
Could the US and Taiwan soon restore
full diplomatic ties, igniting a seismic
shift in the Indo-acific? As tensions
with China soar, Taiwan stands as the
lynch pin of global tech and security.
With Trump's bold vision and Congress
uniting behind historic bills, is this
the ultimate card to counter Beijing's
ambitions. Join us as we unpack the
stakes in this highstakes geopolitical
showdown. In today's context of
escalating USChina confrontation,
Taiwan's unique and critical role in
geostrategic, economic, and
technological domains has made it
increasingly significant, becoming a
primary focal point in the intense
competition between the US and China.
Taiwan is located at the heart of the
Western Pacific's first island chain,
connecting Japan, South Korea, and the
Philippines, serving as a strategic
barrier to curb China's expansion into
the Pacific. The US views Taiwan as key
to maintaining freedom of navigation and
regional security in the Indo-acific.
While the Chinese Communist Party, CCP,
considers Taiwan a critical territory to
break through the first island chain and
achieve maritime hijgemony. The Taiwan
Strait is one of the world's busiest
shipping lanes, handling over half of
global cargo traffic daily.
Additionally, it serves as a vital choke
point for Middle Eastern oil shipments
to East Asia, meaning control over
Taiwan equates to control over the
energy lifelines of East Asian nations.
Taiwan's semiconductor industry holds an
irreplaceable position globally,
mastering the most advanced
manufacturing processes. The US ensures
supply chain security and high-tech
sectors through technological
cooperation and investments. While the
CCP facing a technological gap is eager
to acquire Taiwan's expertise, hoping to
weaken Western technological dominance
by controlling Taiwan. Moreover, Taiwan
boasts a robust RMD ecosystem and a
talent pool that attracts collaboration
with global tech giants. The US sees
Taiwan as a partner in countering
China's technological rise, while the
CCP employs united front tactics and
espionage to steal cuttingedge
technologies. Thus, Taiwan is pivotal in
geostrategic terms for Indopacific
security and control of the first island
chain, economically for dominating
global chip supply chains and trade
energy routes, and technologically for
leading innovation in semiconductors and
integrated circuits. The US values
Taiwan to safeguard allied security, the
free world order, and technological
superiority, while the CCP views Taiwan
as a core target for unification,
breaking geographic containment, and
catching up technologically. This
intense focus from both sides positions
Taiwan at the heart of US China rivalry
influencing the global strategic
balance. On May 5th this year, the US
House of Representatives unanimously
passed two Taiwan related bills aimed at
easing restrictions on bilateral
engagement and supporting Taiwan's
participation in international
organizations. The first bill, the
Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act,
mandates the State Department to conduct
periodic reviews of its guidelines for
US engagement with Taiwan and Taiwanese
officials. It also requires the State
Department to report to Congress every 2
years on these guidelines, identifying
opportunities to lift remaining
self-imposed limitations on US Taiwan
engagement and outlining a plan to do
so. Introduced in February by Republican
Anne Wagner and Democrats Jerry Connelly
and Ted Louu, the bill passed by a voice
vote. It still requires Senate approval
and the president's signature to become
law. After severing ties with Taiwan,
officially named the Republic of China,
ROC, in 1979, Washington developed
guidelines to limit official
interactions with Taiwan to avoid
provoking the People's Republic of
China, PRC, which claims Taiwan as part
of its territory. These guidelines
include prohibiting senior US executive
branch officials, including high-ranking
military officers, from visiting Taiwan,
while also barring Taiwan's top leaders
from traveling to the US meetings
between officials from both sides must
meet specific requirements such as being
held outside official federal buildings
or requiring Taiwanese officials to
refrain from wearing official uniforms
or insignia. Former Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo lifted these guidelines in
the final month of Donald Trump's first
term, but many were reinstated under the
Joe Biden administration. The second
bill, the Taiwan International
Solidarity Act, amends the 2019 Taipei
Act, directing the US government to
support Taiwan's participation in
international organizations and
encouraging other countries to
strengthen official or unofficial ties
with Taiwan. The bill clarifies that UN
resolution 2758 passed in 1971, which
recognized the PRC as the sole
legitimate government of China and
expelled representatives of Chiang
Kai-shek, then leader of the ROC
governing Taiwan, does not address
Taiwan's representation in the U and or
related organizations. The bill also
expands reporting requirements under the
Taipei Act to include information on
China's efforts to undermine Taiwan's
international participation and its
relationships with other countries. Both
bills in earlier versions passed the
House in 2023, but were not taken up by
the Senate, necessitating reintroduction
after the new Congress convened on
January 3rd. The unanimous passage
reflects a bipartisan consensus in
Congress on the Taiwan issue,
comprehensively strengthening strategic
cooperation between the US and Taiwan.
As early as Trump's first term before
taking office as president-elect, he
spoke with Taiwanese President Saiing
Wen on December 2nd, 2016, marking the
first direct conversation between a US
president or president-elect and a
Taiwanese president since the US severed
diplomatic ties with Taiwan in 1979.
This event broke long-standing
diplomatic conventions. During his first
term, Trump facilitated significant arm
sales to Taiwan, including F-16V fighter
jets, Harpoon missiles, highars, and M1
A2 tanks, totaling over $18 billion.
These sales significantly enhanced
Taiwan's air defense, maritime defense,
and asymmetric warfare capabilities.
Beyond bolstering Taiwan's self-defense,
these actions strengthened US strategic
support for Taiwan amid growing US China
tensions, altering the long-standing
military imbalance in the Taiwan Strait.
Since the new Trump administration took
office, it has implemented measures such
as reclaiming control of the Panama
Canal, pursuing Greenland's
reintegration, strengthening
Indo-Pacific partnerships with Japan and
India, reducing or withdrawing US
defense forces in Europe, and even
mediating a Russia Ukraine ceasefire,
all aimed at comprehensively containing
the CCP. Looking at the first island
chain, it is evident that South Korea,
Japan, and the Philippines host US
military bases and troops. While Taiwan,
the most critical link facing the
greatest CCP pressure, lacks a US
military presence. Thus, rapidly
enhancing Taiwan's self-defense
capabilities has become an urgent
priority for the security of the First
Island chain. Recently, Trump publicly
criticized Nixon's China policy. China's
been ripping us off many years, so maybe
something should be thought about. you
know, little bit of retribution. China's
been ripping us off for many years, ever
since they started. To me, I think it
was the worst thing that Richard Nixon
ever did. And it was said, you know,
he's the one that got it started and
they've taken advantage of. Some
observers interpret this as a signal
that the Trump administration is
preparing for a comprehensive decoupling
from China. In this context, how will US
Taiwan relations be handled? Let's
examine expert opinions. Germant
Liilari, a retired US Air Force officer,
visiting scholar at National Changi
University and National Defense
University and guest researcher at the
Institute for National Defense and
Security Research published a report on
March 2nd titled Ensuring Taiwan
Security, the best feasible options. The
report reveals that despite the CCP's
pressure on Taiwan through espionage,
united front tactics, military
exercises, cyber attacks, economic
coercion, and diplomatic isolation,
Taiwanese people have not become more
pro-CCCP. According to a December 2024
National Changi University poll, 76% of
Taiwanese support maintaining the status
quo or pursuing independence, while
support for unification with the CCP
dropped from 26.1% in 2018 to 13.3%
today. This has led the CCP to lose
confidence in peaceful unification. In
response, the CCP has taken measures
including legal threats. In June 2024,
the CCP updated laws to strengthen
punishment of Taiwan independence
advocates, explicitly allowing the death
penalty for those supporting Taiwan's
independence or national division.
Military pressure. Under article 8 of
the 2005 anti-section law, if peaceful
unification is deemed impossible, the
CCP may use non- peaceful means to
defend its sovereignty. The CCP believes
increased coercion will force Taiwan to
submit, but Taiwanese resolve for
freedom and independence remains
unshaken. As a result, the risk of war
is growing, and Taiwan must adopt
measures beyond traditional taboss to
respond. The report identifies Taiwan's
main challenges: insufficient defense
preparedness. In 2024, KMT and TPP
legislators froze budgets and cut
funding for submarines, drones, and
other weapons, weakening defense.
Taiwan's defense budget is only 2.45%
45% of GDP, below the 3% target for
2025. Of Taiwan's 1.66 million
reserveists, only 7% have received
training with short durations, 1 to two
weeks every 2 years, inadequate to
counter CCP threats. CCP's invasion
timeline. The CCP may follow a planned
invasion timeline, requiring Taiwan and
the US to adjust strategies to delay CCP
actions. The report proposes six
solutions with Taiwan focusing on two
key points. One, increase defense
budget. Urge opposition parties to stop
obstructing budgets to ensure defense
spending growth. Propose allocating $20
billion annually from Taiwan's 775.8
billion foreign exchange reserves to
defense, raising the budget to 5% of
GDP, approximately 40 billion. The DPP
should organize recalls of 3240 pro-CCCP
opposition legislators to restructure
the legislature and advance these
budgets. Two, strengthen reserveist
training. Currently, only 116,000 of
Taiwan's 1.5 million reserveists receive
training annually. The report suggests
training 1 million reserveists yearly
for at least 30 days, referencing
Israel's model. 465,000 reserveists
trained for 42 days annually. Restore
mandatory conscription to 2 years,
currently one year. enforce stricter
recruitment standards and increase
active duty forces, currently 188,000.
For the US, four measures are proposed.
One, update the authorization for use of
military force, AUMF. In 1955, Congress
passed the Formosa Joint Resolution
authorizing President Eisenhower to use
US forces to protect Formosa, Taiwan,
the Pescadoris, and related territories.
This resolution is similar to the 2001
AUMF which authorized President Bush to
wage the global war on terror. Updating
the AUMF to apply to Taiwan would grant
Trump greater flexibility to counter CCP
aggression and strengthen deterrence.
Two, resign the Mutual Defense Treaty
MDT. ressign a bilateral or multilateral
including Japan, South Korea, and the
Philippines defense treaty reviving the
1954 Northeast Asia Treaty Organization
NATO proposed by Secretary of State John
Foster Dulles with the Philippines as
NATO plus one. The US Japan ro
trilateral security pact already lays
the groundwork for this. Three, make
Taiwan a US territory. Options include
non-incorporated territories, EIG, Guam,
non-incorporated territories without an
organic act, E G American Samoa, or
ideally a compact of free association,
CFA, like the Marshall Islands,
Micronesia, and Palao. These freely
associated states, FAS, are sovereign UN
members with bilateral CFAs under which
the US is responsible for their defense
and security. Four, make Taiwan a US
state, incorporate Taiwan as a US state.
This is not far-fetched. In the 1850s,
two US diplomats at the Formosa
consulate proposed this policy. On
Taiwan's side, the Liching Tay
administration is taking proactive
steps. A grassroots movement to recall
pro-CCCP opposition legislators is
gaining momentum. President lie has also
stated, "Expand purchases from the US to
reduce the trade deficit. The Ministry
of National Defense has submitted a
military procurement list and all
procurements will proceed actively." On
the US side, all but the last proposal
are feasible with each option bringing
US Taiwan relations closer, though with
increasing difficulty. This report
reflects the high priority that Taiwan's
government and US political circles
place on US Taiwan relations. Given the
bipartisan voting patterns on Taiwan
related bills in Congress and Trump's
personal stance, a major breakthrough in
US Taiwan relations, such as
reestablishing diplomatic ties or
restoring the ROC's legitimate status in
the U, and is reasonably anticipated in
the near future. At that point, the US
and its Indoacific allies could complete
a comprehensive strategy to contain
communist China, achieving the desired
effect. The CCP would face two choices:
reform or collapse. The Chinese people
may also seize this opportunity to break
free from communist authoritarian rule
and achieve a comprehensive renewal. We
welcome your comments and unique
opinions or suggestions. Thanks for you
watching. We'll see you next time.
