詳解華府DC機場美航和黑鷹相撞,韓國飛機撞鳥,俄羅斯飛彈打民航機

空難詳解
5 位粉絲
66 觀看·2025年6月4日
How did an American Airlines plane and a Black Hawk helicopter end up in a tragic crash while
the plane was attempting to land on runway 33? In the videos ahead, we'll take a closer look
at the final hours leading up to the crash, the confusion between the PAP-25 VIP military
helicopter and the air traffic controller, and how the rescue operation is being carried out.
More details all in the video ahead. The plane had departed from Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower
National Airport in Kansas earlier that evening. A PSA Airlines aircraft, operated under American
Airlines and identified as Flight AA-5342, collided midair with a military Black Hawk
helicopter at approximately 9 p.m. on Wednesday, January 29, 2025. The tragic incident occurred as
the plane was making its final approach toward Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington,
Virginia. American Airlines confirmed that 64 people were aboard the jet, 60 passengers and
four crew members, while three soldiers were aboard the military helicopter. This plane's
radio transponder stopped transmitting about 2,400 feet, which is around 730 meters short of the
runway, roughly over the middle of the river. This has marked the first major U.S. commercial crash
in more than 15 years. From an aerial perspective, it is evident that Flight AA-5342 was approaching
the airport from the south, descending over the scenic Potomac River. This area is known for its
proximity to several iconic landmarks, such as the Pentagon, located nearby in Pentagon City.
To the north, one can spot the striking dome of the United States Capitol building,
a symbol of American democracy. The Potomac River, which encircles the airport and much
of Arlington, serves as a natural boundary and offers breathtaking views for arriving flights.
However, this area is also densely trafficked, both by air and on the ground, adding to the
complexity of air traffic management in the region. American Airlines Flight 5342, which
we'll refer to as the landing flight, was on its final approach to Runway 33. At this stage called
short final, the aircraft was mere moments from landing, flying at an altitude of about 400 feet.
This is the most critical phase of landing where every second counts and pilots are laser-focused
on safely bringing the plane down. At the same time, an Army Blackhawk helicopter, identified
as PAC-25, was reportedly on a possible training flight. It was flying perpendicular to the flight
path of Flight 5342, following the course of the Potomac River. The Potomac River is a designated
flight corridor for helicopters, and it's common to see aircraft like this operating in the area.
The key difference between the two aircraft in this scenario was their operating rules.
The Blackhawk helicopter, PAC-25, was flying under visual flight rules. This means it was
required to rely on visual observation of its surroundings to avoid other aircraft.
The landing flight, 5342, was operating under instrument flight rules, which give it priority
over VFR flights in controlled airspace. This system assumes that VFR aircraft will actively
maintain visual separation to avoid conflicts. Moments before the collision, the air traffic
control tower at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport called PAC-25 to confirm
whether they had the other aircraft in sight. PAC-25 responded that they did. At first glance,
this seems like an acknowledgment that they were aware of Flight 5342's presence and were taking
steps to avoid it. However, it now seems likely that PAC-25 had mistakenly identified a different
aircraft, possibly a departing flight from the same airport, and believed that was the other
aircraft referred to by the tower. Tragically, PAC-25 may not have realized that Flight 5342
was descending directly into its path. This misidentification could have led to the Blackhawk
failing to adjust its course in time to avoid a collision. Although I'm not a pilot, this is what
appears to have happened based on the available information. It's a heartbreaking incident that
raises questions about how such misunderstandings can occur and what safety measures can prevent
them in the future. If you have more insight or expertise, please feel free to share your
thoughts in the comments. The passenger plane broke into multiple pieces and sank several feet
into the river. Meanwhile, the helicopter ended up landing upside down on the water.
Regarding the rescue mission, the main challenge is access. The water they're working in is about
8 feet deep, which is roughly 2.5 meters. On top of that, the conditions are tough.
There's strong wind, chunks of ice floating around, which obstructs rescue workers.
We also have audio from Air Traffic Control that has been published online capturing the
moments as the two aircraft approach each other. In the recording, we can hear a conversation.
It appears to involve the air traffic controller with P standing for priority air transport,
the helicopter, and CRJ referring to the passenger plane.
The response seems to come from the helicopter, but something goes terribly wrong.
The two aircraft continue to move closer to each other until they crash and there was no response
from the other side. This long shot video recorded by the Kenby Center cam seems to show two aircraft,
a helicopter and a commercial airliner colliding creating a huge flash.
If you take a closer shot, you can clearly see the Black Hawk helicopter traveling at
an alarmingly high speed directly towards the plane, a moment of impending danger captured
in stark detail. According to reports, the situation unfolded due to apparent confusion
on the part of the Black Hawk pilot. He was seemingly unaware of the presence of a second
aircraft in the vicinity, which ultimately led to a critical misjudgment. When the flight
controller radioed in, asking if the pilot had identified Flight 5342, the pilot confidently
confirmed that he had visual contact. However, the plane he was referring to wasn't Flight 5342,
it was a completely different aircraft flying above his position. This misidentification
proved costly. The pilot, certain he was operating safely, continued his course.
Tragically, he ended up flying directly into the path of an oncoming aircraft.
The sequence of events highlights the immense complexity and risks of aviation,
where even small communication errors or lapses in situational awareness can lead to dangerous,
life-threatening outcomes. Let's take a look at a different case scenario of a Jeju Air Flight 2216.
This South Korean airline was granted permission to land from the south on Runway 1 northward.
But Control Tower cautions against bird activity, so the aircraft made a slight deviation in flight
path. The pilot declares mayday after it hit a couple of birds and it was instructed to make a
go-around and land on Runway 19 southward. It was at this moment the airplane encountered another
problem with the landing gear which did not open. Finally, the plane had to make a belly landing
with what was supposedly a landing gear failure because it hit in the middle of the runway
and crashed into the elevated local Leiser antenna and concrete erupting into a huge fireball,
while the tail section remained intact.
Morning 857. A TC broadcasts a cautionary advisory about bird activity in the vicinity of the
airport. 859. The pilot of Flight 7C2216 reports a bird strike, declares an emergency with repeated.
This is what he said mayday mayday mayday calls and notifies a TC with the message
Bird strike, bird strike, go around. Just one minute after the bird strike at 9 o'clock.
The flight initiates a go-around maneuver and requests authorization to land on Runway 19,
which requires an approach from the opposite end of the airport's single runway that is
from the north to the south, which is not the actual landing procedure.
Usually they land from the south to the north.
901 in the morning. A TC clears the aircraft to land on Runway 19.
902 local time. The aircraft touches down on the runway approximately 1,200 meters,
which translates to 3,940 feet from the threshold of the 2,800 meter.
This is around 9,184 foot runway. 902 and 55 seconds later, the airport fire rescue unit
completes the deployment of fire rescue equipment. 903 Flight 7C2216 overshoots the
runway and crashes into a hill-like structure beyond the runway's end, which later on we came
to know that it hit the localizer antenna and its adjacent concrete embankment.
And finally, we have a missile attack plane crash. At 1043 AM Kazakh time, which is Russia's
Rostov Air Traffic Control Center, received a signal indicating that the crew had decided to
divert the flight to Aktov due to adverse weather conditions in Baku and Makhachkala,
a city in Russia's Dagestan region. At 1053 AM, the Rostov flight director informed Aktov's
flight manager that an oxygen tank in the passenger cabin had exploded. This explosion
reportedly caused passengers to lose consciousness, prompting the crew to request immediate medical
assistance upon landing. Emergency teams were swiftly mobilized at Aktov airport in preparation
for the aircraft's arrival. At 112 AM, the pilots made contact with Aktov airport's air traffic
control tower. Despite their efforts, the crew faced significant challenges during their descent.
They attempted to land twice but were unable to maintain altitude or stabilize the aircraft.
Tragically, at 1128 AM, contact with the crew was lost and moments later,
the plane crashed to the ground. This means the plane was hit between 1030-1053 AM Kazakh time
by the Russian anti-air defense system. In this scenario, the plane is flying at a significantly
higher altitude, rendering the cannons ineffective. Consequently, the system opts to deploy a missile
as the optimal weapon for engagement. The missile is launched vertically from its sealed canister.
It uses its advanced onboard guidance system to navigate with precision towards the designated
target. As the missile approaches, its onboard sensors continue to track the civilian aircraft,
which in this case is tragically identified as an Azerbaijani civilian aircraft.
The missile carries a 25 kg high explosive warhead. Upon reaching the target, the warhead
detonates, releasing an intense explosion. The explosion occurs near the side of the aircraft,
causing catastrophic damage to its tail section. The resulting shrapnel penetrates the fuselage,
inflicting severe internal structural damage. This devastating impact destabilizes the aircraft,
leading to an uncontrollable descent. The severely damaged plane crashes near Akto airport,
resulting in a tragic loss of life and a devastating outcome for all those on board.
