Retired U.S. Navy SEAL Mike Sarraille discussed with NTD's Melina Wisecup the capabilities of Tomahawk weapons, President Donald Trump's consideration of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's proposal to exchange drones for U.S. Tomahawks, and how such a deal would affect U.S. military readiness. Sarraille also discussed the logistics of a military operation, like the U.S. strikes on boats coming from Venezuela reportedly carrying drugs, his response to the Democrats' attempts to block Trump from more strikes, and the lethality of thousands of pounds of fentanyl alone that came into the United States.
Will President Trump agree to Ukrainian
President Vladimir Zalinsk's proposal to
exchange drones for US tomahawks?
Joining me now to discuss these latest
developments is Mike Cerelli. He's a
retired Navy Seal and founder of
legacyexpeditions.net.
Mike, thanks for coming on tonight. What
are homocks capable of?
>> Tomahawks have about a range of 1500
kilometers. So to place tomahawks at the
use and avail of Ukraine would allow
them to reach into Russia uh far past
Moscow, putting their civilians at risk.
However, here's the thing. Trump is
using leverage for both sides. What I
think will happen is you will see an
upsizing in air defense interceptors.
Those are known as Patriots or Gilmers
or attackums. And that will allow
Ukraine to defend itself against these
strikes like the recent Russian strike
that shut down the energy in eight
regions. So, uh, if tomahawks were given
to Ukraine, you can almost guarantee it
would be in a small number. So, there
would be a cap and there would be a US
veto on how they're used strictly
against Russian military targets.
So, President Trump today spoke about
the cost of the US selling weapons to
the EU even when they are paid for.
Mike, let's together listen to what the
president had to say.
>> We need to hawker. We need a lot of
other weapons that we're sending to
Ukraine. One of the reasons we want to
get this war over is exactly that. Uh
it's not easy for us to give you're
talking about massive numbers of very
powerful weapons.
Mike, put this into perspective for us.
How significant is the weaponry that the
US is selling to the U EU for Ukraine.
Do you think it's making a dent in our
own military readiness?
>> It absolutely is. So, you're talking
about high-tech and that is not easy to
manufacture. It's not easy to build.
It's not easy to train upon. So, you
know, even with our munitions, uh we've
seen a a a reduction in our munitions
and our availability to those munitions
because of the ongoing wars. It is time
that one we not only increase the
manufacturing in our defense industry
but also the surplus uh of our munition.
So as we sell it to to our allies and
into the Ukraine in this war, we've got
to be cautious of our arament, our
supply, and you know, always with the
eye on future wars and our preparedness
to fight those. Giving our soldiers the
necessary weapons, tools, and ammunition
they need to win.
Right. So, President Zalinsky floated
the idea of providing drone production
to the US in exchange for the Tomahawks.
Do you think that would be a fair deal?
>> It depends on the uh the deal itself in
in the uh the factors in in the numbers.
But I I'll say this, Ukraine has has
become like the Silicon Valley of drone
warfare. We've had the the benefit of
sitting on the sidelines, so to speak,
and watching the development in
technology, not only with the Ukraine,
but Russia. So if you compare our drone
technology to China, we have been
outpaced. Drones are part of what we
call fifth generation warfare and they
are going to be a uh overused tool in
the future. And so to get access to that
technology and then ramp up our
manufacturing capability to match China
is going to be vitally important in the
future.
>> Now Mike, elsewhere on the world stage,
the US has been carrying out strikes on
drug trafficking boats coming from
Venezuela. Reports suggest that there
may be two survivors of a recent strike
being held right now on a Navy ship. Uh
can you just bring us behind the scenes
when the US military conducts this type
of operation? What generally goes on?
>> So first I've got to say from a personal
standpoint, good. We've been at war with
the cartels for decades and no president
has done anything about it. Uh a lot of
the Republicans showed support. Of
course the Democrats are are going to
cry foul and try to block the president
any way they can. But usually with these
strikes, you know, it is done with the
intelligence community to confirm that
they are one in fact cartels, two that
they are carrying uh uh drugs which
could potentially kill Americans uh
before any strike is approved. Now when
it comes to detainees
because we are not at a a declared state
of war with the cartels that's where
legalities become uh let's say fuzzy and
there is a possibility that these two
detainees can claim uh habius corpus uh
and and be released to Venezuela.
>> You just mentioned Mike the way that
Democrats are responding to this effort.
We just saw Democrats in Congress this
week aim to prevent the president from
engaging in host uh hostilities with
Venezuela. We know only Congress can
declare war. What is within Trump's
power to counter naroterrorism and the
drug trafficking?
>> So, you know, I I can't get into the
constitutional uh amendments that give
him the power, but he is using the power
as the commander-in-chief. Uh what I
would say to the Democrats is are you
more concerned with protecting the
cartels or are you more concerned with
the Americans who can uh get their hands
on and potentially lethal doses of those
drugs? This is about protecting
Americans. And that's where the
Democrats have just lost complete sight.
Um I think it is just a a pure hatred
for Trump. no matter whatever good uh
policies or or initiatives he takes or
decisions he makes, the Democrats are
going to find a way to derail it.
Americans want this. Uh if you look at
fentanyl alone that came across the uh
the border in in the tunes to the tune
of thousands of pounds of fentanyl, uh
it could have killed 15 times the
American population. And that's just
what we interdicted. So this is a threat
to national security. It's a threat to
our American people. and the Democrats
are just flat out wrong.
>> Mike Celli, thanks for coming on,
sharing your perspective, and bringing
context to all of these situations going
on. And we appreciate your time.