Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon says he doesn't see a systemic crisis in the credit sector.
The bank boss told Bloomberg TV's Joumanna Bercetche he believes the US economy is in "quite good shape," though he cautioned that there remains a lot of uncertainty.
If the economy slows sharply, or if a major macro event shakes market confidence, losses would emerge across the system, he said. “But that’s different than a systemic crisis.”
Solomon reiterated his comments that the recent losses at regional banks tied to alleged fraud were “idiosyncratic events,” but said they serve as a reminder to stay vigilant about underwriting standards.
David Solomon was speaking at the Future Investment Initiative in Riyadh, where he also told Bloomberg that the Wall Street lender plans to triple its headcount in Saudi Arabia. Speaking exclusively to Bloomberg, Solomon also said inflation continues to pose a significant headwind for many US consumers.
The boss of one of Wall Street's biggest banks added that he sees artificial intelligence as an exciting driver of global growth in the coming years, predicting significant productivity gains over the next 36 months.
Let's just talk through the series of initiatives that you've done in the region over the past
12 months.
Because from what I can see, you're really doubling down on your asset management business.
Earlier this year, you announced a partnership with PIF in asset management.
Last week, you announced that you're expanding wealth management in Saudi Arabia as well.
So what's the vision here?
What's the kind of growth that you're looking to achieve?
Well, we're certainly excited about what's going on in Saudi Arabia, what's going on
in the GCC more broadly.
I think it's a big opportunity for our business.
We've been here for a while.
But we've certainly been investing and expanding.
Here in Saudi Arabia, we opened a new office this year.
We've got about 20 people on the ground here, but we're probably headed to about 60.
And the big reason for that expansion is we've recently launched the initiative of our high
end private wealth business here in the region.
And so that will bring more resources, more attention, and more focus.
We've been in the region for quite some time.
We've been active as a member of the Tarawa.
I think we were one of the early participants in the equity markets here.
And so we've been very, very involved in the equity markets
as an international firm.
We've led some of the largest IPOs in the region.
I think you're going to continue to see an influx of capital
markets transactions.
And I think that's something that certainly we
want to sit in the middle of those flows.
Financing has always been core to Goldman Sachs' strategy
in any part of the world.
You mentioned our partnership with the private investment
fund around private credit.
That's something we're certainly excited about, too.
So when you step back and you think about the progress here
in the kingdom, the need for foreign direct investment
to come in to continue to allow the population here
to participate more economically,
the changes that are coming from the investment
that the kingdom's making in infrastructure
and the local economy here, we think
it's a great opportunity for Goldman Sachs
to continue to partner with the kingdom.
Do you see that investment coming in?
I think there's great opportunity.
I think it's one of the things that the Crown Prince is
very focused on, is how do you look at,
when you think about the exports particularly of energy here,
how do you create a more localized economy?
And so I do see signs of an increase in that activity,
particularly around things like tourism and investment
in infrastructure that can support tourism,
but also in certain manufacturing areas.
And I do think one of the things that's interesting
is AI and the ability for there to be AI infrastructure here
that can be used and can be exported to different places
in the region and around the world.
Yeah, and certainly many people are
eyeing up the opportunities there.
You also opened up an office in Kuwait as well.
So talk us through the plans there.
Sure, we have a partnership with Kuwait.
And we've actually been in Kuwait
and have done business in Kuwait going back to the 1970s.
So it's a long-term partnership.
What I think's interesting about what's going on
in Kuwait at the moment is there's a real effort
after a period of time following the war in the 1990s
where they really did not put the capital
into the infrastructure and growth locally
and they had a legislative branch
that was stopping progress.
The emir now is taking action to really spur
significant investment, significant growth,
and we're very proud to partner with the leadership there
in helping them think through strategically
how to expand that growth.
So Goldman has offices now in pretty much
all of the financial hubs of the region.
And I just wonder whether you think it is necessary
or it helps to get access to these types of pools of capital
to these long-term commitments,
actually having a physical presence in the country as well.
I think it helps enormously.
And the world changes and there's lots of technology
and there's lots of flexibility, but showing up matters.
You don't have to look much farther
than outside of us here today.
There are an awful lot of people from all over the world
that have shown up here because they want
to build relationships, partnerships,
they want to participate.
And so whether it's here in this region,
or you can go back to the United States,
why do we have localized offices all across the country
in the United States?
Because in those communities, people want presence,
they want direct connectivity, they want to show up.
While technology in the world evolves,
human-to-human contact is not going away.
Yeah, no, that's true.
That's a fair point.
But do you think it's also fair to say that,
in the old days, and typically,
funds would come here to get capital
and then offer investment returns.
And nowadays, sovereign wealth funds are saying,
it's not just enough to offer us investment returns.
So they've evolved in their thinking.
I think the whole scope of economic activity
has really changed enormously.
There's no question, if you go back,
my old days are a lot older than your old days.
But if you go back a while,
these nations were exporters of capital around the world,
and they had not built the infrastructure
of professional investment capabilities here locally,
and so they were outsourcing those capabilities
to institutions like ours and others.
Now, they're really making long-term investments
to build their economies,
to allow their populations to participate,
to attract investment here.
And so what they need,
and they've got incredible investment infrastructures here,
localized on the ground.
What they need are ideas,
what they need are liquidity and capital,
what they need are strategic initiatives.
And so we're just at a moment in time
where they have the capacity
to do many more interesting things to build their economies.
Think about Saudi Arabia here in the kingdom,
35 million people.
There's an enormous opportunity,
given that population,
to continue to expand the economic activity
on a localized basis here.
And they're looking for partners that can help drive that.
Do you think alternative assets are gonna pick up here?
This part of the world has always allocated
a significant portion of their surpluses
to investing in privates.
If what you're asking is,
will there be interesting investment opportunities
on the ground here in these local economies?
Yes, absolutely.
As these economies grow,
there will be more interesting investment opportunities
here on the ground that attract international capital
from around the world.
And we've obviously been seeing that
in a more significant way
over the course of the last five years.
Yeah.
Okay, let's broaden this out a little bit.
Your earnings came through again.
It seems as though the bank
is really firing on all cylinders,
whether it's trading, markets activity,
deal-making, advisory, wealth management.
So everything seems to be going quite well at the moment.
How long do you expect these favorable market conditions
to last for?
Well, I appreciate that.
We certainly had a strong quarter
and our client franchise is in terrific shape,
but I really think that the firm is benefiting
from a bunch of strategic decisions
that we made five, six, seven years ago
to reposition the firm for growth,
to really grow our core business
of investment banking and markets,
put more financial resources into the business
so that we could take more wallet share
with our clients and be in a position
to better serve our clients
as they were increasingly active,
and also to pull a group of businesses together
to create our asset and wealth management platform,
which now supervises three and a half trillion dollars.
We've said publicly, we think it can grow
in terms of its durable revenue, high single digits.
It's growing better than that.
And the combination of those activities
has materially uplifted the returns of the firm.
So the environment is conducive at the moment.
There'll be times when the environment
is a little less conducive.
We live in a cyclical world.
But we think we have the firm position
that over the next five, 10 years,
we can continue to grow our earnings,
grow our client footprint,
and continue to compete at the highest levels
of the businesses that we're in.
So one thing I was thinking about this morning,
if you just took a snapshot of where everything is trading,
you have equities at all-time highs,
you have U.S. economy tracking north at 3%.
If you look at the real-time indicators,
you've got inflation at 3% as well.
And yet somehow the Fed are gonna be cutting interest rates
by 25 basis points tomorrow.
Do you see this as the beginning
of a sequential easing cycle,
or just more of an insurance cut?
What I would say with respect to the Fed
is the Fed will cut rates tomorrow,
and then we'll see.
I know the consensus is you'll get another cut
before the end of the year.
But the policy rate has been higher.
I think they're looking to move more toward neutral,
and so we'll take a step in that direction.
But I think the Fed always is an observer
of what's going on in the real-time economy.
The real-time economy can shift very quickly.
At the moment, I would say the U.S. economy
is in quite good shape.
But I wouldn't jump forward.
There are lots of forward prognostications
about the path of interest rates.
I would just highlight mostly,
you know, I'd look at the moment.
You can project forward,
but just because there's a forward projection,
it doesn't mean that's where we'll wind up.
There's a lot of uncertainty out there.
There's a lot of uncertainty.
Do you believe that this is a K-shaped economy?
Lots of academic circles have been talking about that
in the sense that, you know,
upper-income earners seem to be thriving,
whereas lower-income earners are struggling
to keep up with inflation,
and they're worried about potential job cuts to come.
I wouldn't use that term,
but what I would say is businesses
that are particularly sensitive
to lower-income or paycheck-to-paycheck consumers
have been a little softer.
And I would say, you know,
consumers that are paycheck-to-paycheck
feel more pressure in an environment with 3% inflation.
And so there's no question,
inflation is very, very difficult
for people who live paycheck-to-paycheck.
And so it's something I think
we have to watch very carefully.
You know, I know there's been progress
from where we were a few years ago on inflation,
but it's important that we get inflation back to target
because in any environment where it runs hotter,
certainly people in that income strata feel it more acutely.
But I'd still say, overall,
the U.S. consumer is in good shape.
Most of the data that I see around the U.S. consumer
is still quite constructive,
but I think you're highlighting something
that needs to be watched carefully.
Yeah.
Another thing that needs to be watched carefully
is perhaps, you know, the credit situation.
A couple of weeks ago,
we were talking about tricolor first brands.
You know, one of your peers in the industry
described there being cockroaches,
potentially cockroaches around.
I don't know if, you know,
there's a certain insect reference
that you want to pick up on,
but ultimately, you know,
how worried are you about some of these
individual idiosyncratic credit incidents
actually becoming systemic?
I would put the three situations that you mentioned
in the category at the moment of idiosyncratic events,
but what I would highlight is,
I think there's a great opportunity
for people that are in credit businesses
and are deploying significant capital
as lenders in credit businesses
to look at their procedures, their practices,
their underwriting standards,
look through their portfolio,
and really take a strong evaluation of where they are.
You can't separate the fact that we've been
in a very, very long, easy credit cycle,
one of the longest I've seen in my career,
without a real credit pullback,
without, you know, an economic environment
that's really put an enormous amount of pressure on credit,
and in that context,
credit spreads are historically tight,
and I know at some point there will be a credit cycle,
it will probably come at a period of time
when the economy slows more acutely,
or there's some sort of a macro event
that changes confidence we have in growth
and the trajectory of the economy,
and when that happens,
given the velocity of lending activity,
there will be losses in credit,
and those losses will be felt across the system,
but that's different than a systemic,
you know, a systemic crisis,
and I don't see anything in the context
of a handful of bad credit situations
that's leading me to say
that we have a systemic issue around the corner.
Unfortunately, you know, lenders make mistakes,
there is fraud in markets,
and, you know, that's something that as lenders
we all have to try to protect against,
but we should not be fooled by the fact
that this is a very robust credit environment,
credit spreads are tight,
and when we do have a cycle,
which probably will come when there's an economic slowdown,
there will be losses,
and we'll feel that across the economy.
Yeah, and that's trickling down to private credit,
we spoke about that a year ago, I remember,
and I just wonder whether you think
the easy money, so to speak, in private credit,
those days are behind us now,
just because of how much interest there's been
and how much spreads have compressed there.
I don't think about, when I think about lending,
I don't think about, you know, easy money.
You know, lending is an activity,
whether it's private credit,
or it's banks lending activity,
lending is a through-the-cycle activity.
There's no question when spreads are tight,
you actually earn lower relative returns,
but the real alpha for credit market participants
comes in the tough cycles,
when you have to restructure credits,
you have to have more conviction to enter credits,
because you can earn higher returns,
and so the real alpha in long-cycle credit investing
comes from being able to manage,
not just at times when credit spreads are tight,
but also when there's a difficult cycle.
And so, you know, I don't think about it as easy money.
If you're a lender, you're a lender,
you participate, and you hopefully
have good underwriting standards,
you take good reserves,
and so when there is economic pressure,
and there are losses,
you can smooth through the cycle
your returns to a reasonable place,
and that's what good lenders do.
Okay, so we've talked about equities, Fed, the credit.
Let me ask you about the dollar.
The dollar, you know, is down almost 10% year-to-date.
It has been a challenging year for the USD.
People are questioning this theme of US exceptionalism.
Do you worry that the US is perhaps
somehow losing its relative status?
I don't.
I think the US, I think US preeminence,
especially from an investment perspective,
is a theme that's still firmly in place,
that you can walk around here and talk to capital allocators
that are here from all over the world,
and they're not fundamentally changing their allocation,
you know, across the globe,
and if you think about what are the more interesting places
in the world to invest at this point in time,
the US is still at the top of the list,
and is the largest, most important economy,
the largest, most important tech innovation center
in the world.
You know, I think that's firmly in place.
The dollar has been softer this year.
There are a variety of reasons for it,
but a perspective would be it's certainly much stronger
than it was 10, 15 years ago,
when we saw, for example, you know, $1.40, you know,
Euro dollars, so everything's gotta be put
through a longer-term lens when you think about the dollar,
but I don't worry about the US and its preeminence
as an attractive place to invest.
The growth in that economy, the tech innovation ecosystem,
you know, I think the US is in a pretty good place.
Okay, David, I've gotta round up asking about AI
and sort of how you're incorporating it
into your bank operations.
You know, are you seeing efficiency gains there?
Sure, this is an enormous opportunity
for every enterprise in the world,
and I think it's one of the reasons why I'm very excited
about growth in the world over the course
of the next few years,
because I think the productivity opportunity
for enterprises, large even to very,
very small businesses, is enormous.
We made an announcement last week or 10 days ago
around our earnings about Goldman Sachs,
one Goldman Sachs 3.0, where we laid out, you know,
six things that we wanted to accomplish
around better client service, more efficiency,
an ability to really improve our risk management
across the firm, and we are looking
at a handful of processes where we can really
re-underwrite these processes,
create automation and efficiency,
but not just to take cost out,
to allow us to invest in growth in the business.
And so this is a theme that I think most CEOs
of large enterprises are looking closely at,
and the productivity benefit to the economy broadly
as people execute on this is very meaningful.
It's starting, we're still early,
but I think over the next 24 to 36 months,
you're gonna see real benefits from these efforts.
Is AI gonna replace entry-level jobs?
Analyst jobs?
I mean, it will replace, it will change certain jobs
the same way technology has changed certain jobs
for my entire 42 years in the business.
So you think back when I started,
if, as an analyst, I was required to do something,
I had to go to the library, I had to go to the microfiche,
I had to get data, it took hours.
Things that take five seconds now,
like doing a common stock comparison, took six hours,
yet we still have lots of very productive people
doing more to serve our clients.
I think the lens that you have to look at
is technology is always changing work, changing jobs,
adjusting the mix of different kinds of jobs,
but it doesn't mean that businesses don't grow,
economies don't grow, and opportunities
for very productive people don't grow.
And I don't think it's gonna be different this time,
although I do think there are jobs that will be different,
and there are jobs that will go away.
But that doesn't mean new jobs won't be created.
Take me back to my banking days.
The MD would send me an email at 6 p.m. on a Friday
to fix a pitch book by Monday morning,
and you know that your weekend was gonna be
completely consumed by that.
That's long gone, yet people are still working very hard,
and the kind of work they do changes.
And here's the thing that I think's really, really important.
You can't, you can teach investment banking,
so you know this, you were an investment banker
at Goldman Sachs, you can teach investment banking skills,
but you can't teach relationship building,
trust, advice giving.
That's a apprenticeship skill-based business,
and that's something that I think's very sustainable,
but technology tools make the people that do that
much, much more productive.
David, we thank you for your time.
Thank you so much.
Well, thank you.
Delighted to see you.
David Solomon, Group CEO of Goldman Sachs.