(S) vill riva upp förändrad a-kassa

Arda Larsen Krabi Social Democrats You're critical of the government's changes to the A-tax Why is that It's unreasonable for A-kassan to be reduced in this manner people already face a cut to 70% after just a hundred days Moreover the ceiling is also lowered for income insurance policies that individuals have privately taken out and paid for It is utterly unreasonable for this to happen at a time when we have the EU's third-highest unemployment rate mass unemployment affecting new groups which is why we want to dismantle this deterioration of the A-kassa so that people can keep their compensation and this reduction after day one hundred does not take effect What would you like to see instead What changes would you like to see We want A-kassan to remain at 80% even after the hundredth day of unemployment As it was before the deterioration implemented by the Sweden Democrats and the government One must remember that the Sweden Democrats solemnly and repeatedly promised that precisely this would not happen—that A-kassan would not be worsened It was a very clear promise from Jimmie Åkesson Now we are carrying out this deterioration at a time when we know that construction workers warehouse staff and countless other groups Unemployment has reached levels we haven't seen in years and it's extremely serious What do you think about Sweden Democrats breaking this promise Disgraceful I think Jimmie Åkesson should be ashamed of himself It is the wage earners who end up paying the price for the betrayal as the A-kassan is reduced accordingly I'll debate the Sweden Democrats anywhere anytime They're welcome to come and face me Workers also joined a debate over why the A-kassan is being cut despite promises that it wouldn't be reduced