Ted Cruz's Opening Statement on Big Tech Censorship | Short Clips

PragerU
792 followers
21 Video Views·Apr 8, 2025
Sen. Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Judiciary's Subcommittee on the Constitution, discusses Big Tech censorship and its impact on conservative voices.
Sign the petition: https://l.prageru.com/2Tyvcv1
good afternoon let me say to folks who
are attending I apologized the hearing
was delayed in our start time we had a
series of votes in the Senate floor that
just concluded and so welcome welcome to
our witnesses this past April this
subcommittee held a hearing on social
media bias with witnesses from Facebook
and Twitter as I noted then any any
inquiry into big text censorship
practices must take an especially hard
look at Google that's what we're doing
here today
Google's control over what people here
watch read and say is unprecedented
almost 90% of internet searches in the
United States use Google Google's
domination of the search engine market
is so complete that - Google is now a
commonplace verb with that market power
Google can and often does control our
discourse and sometimes tech companies
talk about their products and the
effects of those products as though
their forces outside of Big Tex control
as we've heard time and time again Big
Tex favored defense is it wasn't me the
algorithm did it but Google search
engine isn't some supernatural force
it's a computer program written and
maintained by people so every time we
search on Google we see only the web
pages that Google decides we should see
in the order that Google decides we
should see them type a few letters into
the search bar and Google will tell you
what you should be looking for the same
is true of Google's subsidiary YouTube
the second most visited web page in
existence when you search on YouTube
programs written by people at YouTube
provide you with the results when you
watch a video a program written by the
people at YouTube
suggests what you should watch next and
when you submit a video people at
YouTube determine whether you've engaged
in so-called hate speech an
ever-changing and vague standard meant
to give censorship an air of legitimacy
this is a staggering amount of power to
ban speech to manipulate search results
to destroy rivals and to shape culture
more and more Americans are demanding
accountability from big tech for that
massive power one thing is certain
Congress never intended to empower large
technology companies to control our
speech when it passed section 230 of the
Communications Decency Act that
provision section 230 gave tech
companies special privileges that nobody
else gets if the New York Times or The
Wall Street Journal were to publish an
op-ed that libeled a private citizen
they can be held responsible this is the
case even when those organizations don't
write the content that breaks the law
they can be held responsible merely for
publishing it not so for companies like
Google and YouTube if someone uses one
of those services to commit slander or
to transmit classified material or to
traffic guns or drugs
far too often Google is off the hook
section 230 makes it immune big tech
gets a perk a subsidy that no one else
does Fox News MSNBC or anybody else this
immunity however was part of a deal it
was a trade section 230 the text of it
refers to the Internet as quote a forum
for a true to
city a political discourse that was the
trade at the hardest section 230 this is
because we expected tech companies in
the business of carrying others speech
wouldn't favor any side when they did so
there wouldn't be a conservative
internet in the liberal internet there
just be the internet that bargain today
is falling apart big tech continues to
reap the benefits of his section 230
subsidy but the American people do not
the American people are instead subject
to both overt censorship and covert
manipulation I believe it's time to
rethink that deal if big tech cannot
provide us with evidence clear
compelling data and evidence that it's
not playing Big Brother with its vast
immense powers there's no reason on
earth why Congress should give them a
special subsidy through section 230 and
that takes us to the heart of the
problem big tech is anything but
transparent Google is happy to collect
data on everyone everywhere constantly
on you on me on all of us they make sure
they know what you search what you shop
for online what you like they track your
location within a matter of feet so that
they know when you visit a physical
store but the information sharing is a
one-way street this must change Google
cannot simply hide behind its algorithms
Big Tex algorithms and search engines
only do what humans that companies like
Google tell them to do just as big tech
needs and wants data on all of us the
American people need and want data on
big tech
they need it to profit we need it to
protect free speech and I hope that
today Google will start to answer some
of our questions fully and candidly so
that we can assess how we can work
together to protect the robust
marketplace of ideas that American
political discourse has been built upon
