▪︎ Incredible to think this was a 1960s news report on vaccines ineffect(中文自設-貼文)

隨人而人
102 followers
58 Video Views·Mar 6, 2026
▪︎ 收藏系列:Incredible to think this was a 1960s news report on vaccines ineffect(中文自設-貼文)
From X_@ABridgen channel (03.06.2026)
Incredible to think this was a 1960s news report on vaccines ineffectiveness and the harms they caused including - flu vaccine!
Now Big Pharma control both MSM and Government so anyone questioning vaccine ‘efficacy or safety’ is cancelled and destroyed.
Please watch and share
難以置信,這竟然是 20 世紀 60 年代關於疫苗無效及其造成的危害(包括流感疫苗)的新聞報導!
現在,大型製藥公司控制了主流媒體和政府,因此任何質疑疫苗「有效性或安全性」的人都會被封鎖。
請觀看並分享
AI Generated·May contain errors
Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge the flu vaccine and the
recommended dosage is ineffective. While in a larger dose, it can be harmful. However,
the flu vaccine is still recommended for old people and the chronically ill.
Last month, a Senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Ribicoff charged that the federal
government wasn't doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines.
Scientists at the Division of Biologic Standards test vaccines for their potency and safety before
licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness
of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine.
Four scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 1960s
found it to be ineffective, said they refused to give it to their own families.
Two were transferred to other work. A third left the division. And over the entire 10-year period,
not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published.
But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the
division and their scientists involves the adenovirus vaccine, a vaccine given to thousands
of American soldiers to prevent certain cold-like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine
contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market.
The vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer. But that was three years after the
division's own scientists had pointed out the danger. Dr. Murray justifies the use of the
vaccine by saying it took three years to examine the evidence against it. It was more important
to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent. More important to
use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove. But since the agent couldn't be
removed, there was no other course. Thus, for three years, American troops were injected with
a cold-preventing vaccine which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. Some of the division's
scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show
some of the vaccines to be ineffective. The control officer in 1960, who has grave doubts
about the potency of influenza vaccine, these doubts were made known to the director of the
division and through the proper channels.
