" SANS INTÉRÊT ! " Quelle est l’idéologie de cette chaine ?

The affirmations and opinions presented in this documentary only engage its author and are not representative at all. Representative? It's the feminine? Well, it starts well, the first sentence already and the guy is wrong. Well done. The theme of this video is, as its name suggests, without interest already, but above all to clarify a little the things about the general ideology of this channel. Following the multiple comments that you all leave generously on each of my videos, usually very nice and encouraging, and that I thank you again, I noticed that some of you, sometimes virulent to not say aggressive and insulting, do not quite seem to have understood the ideological meaning of my videos. Ah yes, first of all, there will be no investigation work in this video, no analysis of events or artifacts, nor any crazy theory, no UFOs, aliens or reptilians. So if that's what you're looking for, you can now click on the little arrow at the top right and go find your happiness elsewhere on YouTube, it's not the content that is missing. Well, if you're still watching and you're still there, it's that what I have to say may interest you. I'm going to make a little update on the content of this channel, on the themes of my videos and on the ideology of Vegeta Investigation, in order to know in which box you can put me. Well, that's nice and all, but then, the ideology of this channel, what is it? Because with so many themes addressed, there must be a damn box where we can put this YouTube channel. So, conspiracy theorist, conformist, negationist, supremacist, revisionist or simply totally nazi, even satanist, where to put this damn Vegeta Investigation channel? If I base myself on the comments you leave me, it gets a little complicated, since I would be both a little of all that. Let's take the example of conspiracy. For some, there is no doubt that my videos are fully developed in adequacy with the different conspiracy theories, whether they are extraterrestrial, reptilian, lunar or historical. On this, I can note two important things. First, well, it's already a little true, since some of the ideas defended in my videos are officially classified in the conspiracy register, like reptilians for example. The hypothesis of the existence of a form of humanoid-reptilian life, notably from our own planet, like that of the dossier Lacerta, particularly holds me at heart, and it's clearly an idea that speaks to me and that seems to me quite possible, given the duration of evolution, for example, as I explained in some of my videos. So, since from an official point of view, this idea is judged as conspiracy theorist, we can note that this channel is. The only problem is that at the same time, I also try to defend the facts, studies and academic analysis, when the latter seem to me true, and even if they go against any conspiracy theory, in the image of ... well, there, in fact, right now, I do not see it, but there must be one, or in any case, the day it appears, I'll let you know, I promise. Ah yes, we could possibly note my stubbornness to proclaim that our planet is spherical, which, in fact, goes against one of the most popular conspiracy theories of the moment, the Flat Earth. In short, yes, I like conspiracy theories, but I do not encourage them, and what I like above all is the potential imaginary creative side that they develop, the research, questions and exchanges that they raise, but not directly the conspiracy itself. So, no, Vegeta Investigation is not a conspiracy channel, at worst, it's just a channel that likes the idea of ​​conspiracy, and wonders about it. Another little joke that comes back in some comments is that of Satanist. Yes, I know, it's violent anyway, but hey, what do you want? Freedom of expression. This type of ideology is generally attributed as soon as I address religious or spiritual subjects. Finally, to be precise, it is rather when I will openly criticize certain religious ideas and certain sacred texts. So, believe it or not, but I have a real passion and immense respect for sacred religious texts, and especially for the Bible, whether the Old or the New Testament. However, I do not stupidly believe what is written there, and I wonder a lot about the ideology, the messages and the deep meaning of the text, as well as the interpretations and values ​​that it brings. As a result, it happened to me, and it will certainly happen to me again, to note a certain incoherence between the words or actions written in the Bible, and the ideological values ​​that this text is supposed to convey. And suddenly, well, that's where I become a Satanist apparently. Well, for some. Except that questioning the coherence between the words and the ideology, even if it concerns the gods, that's not being Satanist. Let's take a precise example. When I say in one of my videos that the request of God to Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac, in order to prove his devotion to him, goes against the ideology of the unique, good and loving God. I just notice that the idea of ​​asking a father to put his own child to death, which he had a lot of trouble with, by the way, does not correspond to the image of love and compassion that the cult of this God wants to make us hear. So I know, for many, it's just a test, a forced passage, so that Abraham proves his unconditional love for God, and that's why an angel, therefore a material representative of God, intervened to save Isaac. Okay, but still, on the ideology, I find it incoherent that a God representing love make this morbid request to his most faithful believer. However, I don't think it makes me a Satanist, unless by the incoherence that I take up, but hey. A priori, a Satanist would approve this sacrificial idea of ​​a father to his son, and so at worst, my observation is more of a nice blasphemy of interrogation than of a cult to Satan himself. So, sorry for all those who would have been shocked by my remarks on the holy texts, but no, I am not a Satanist either, and you will not be able to tick this box if you want to classify this channel. A last term characterizing the ideology of this channel still deserves to be mentioned, that of white supremacist. Many comments have indeed attributed this movement of thought following my special video on the film K-2019. However, it would seem that the YouTubers having perceived on this channel this kind of ideology have not fully understood all of my words. Regarding the video in question, if I came back to the globalization of the Kemit people, having traveled the world and being at the origin of all Mesoamerican constructions in particular, as stated by Mr. Krasniki, I have never rejected the hypothesis of a black people having founded the ancient Egyptian empire. Indeed, the visible traces of morphology typical of this ethnicity are a fact that cannot be denied. The many statues and facies presenting these characteristics show well in my opinion that a black ethnicity populated this region during the ancient empire. But no proof or fact supports the idea defended by Mr. Krasniki in the film K-2019, according to which the Kemit people would have traveled the globe and spread its knowledge on the entirety of the American continent. Therefore, I do not deny the existence of the Kemit civilization in Egypt, but only the globalist vision of this people as presented in the film. There is still a slight nuance. To finish on this accusatory point of white supremacists that can be seen in the videos of this channel, it is true that cultural and ideological references are generally, and even very generally, from Western culture, and this for a very simple reason, because I am from this culture. Quite simply. Could we blame a Japanese YouTuber, for example, to take cultural and ideological references from Asia, to use the sacred texts of his region of the world, or the movements of thought typical of his personal culture? Would he still be an Asian supremacist? I do not think so. Even if this way of proceeding can be considered very limiting compared to all the knowledge that could be brought by other cultures and ideologies, it is only a logical human behavior that consists of looking for as a first reference those that are linked to our own culture, in this case, for this channel, Western European culture. However, this does not make it a white supremacist ideology seeking to deny the existence of other ethnicities or to promote the superiority or even the omnipresence of the culture of which it draws its references. On the contrary. Since this video is ultimately and definitively of no interest, but that I told you from the start, I will not dwell on determining what I am not. The question therefore remains in suspense. But then, how can we classify the ideology of this channel? Well, the answer is very simple. There is in fact only one box that can be checked. Free. Free to address the desired subjects. Free to share questions with all those it might interest. Free to think and say what you want. And free to make mistakes and make mistakes. And it is thanks to this freedom that I can address subjects as varied as Atlantis, the Anunnaki, the Ummites or the Reptilians. And if these themes do not interest you, do not watch my videos, quite simply. I am convinced that you will find your happiness on another channel. And yes, because deep down, our beloved world is not only white or black. But it is made up of an innumerable shade of gray. And limiting yourself to the extremes will never allow you to reach the voice of the environment. This uninteresting video is now coming to an end. And you will finally be able to return to see or do things a little more constructive. Thank you and see you next time.