(Videorozhovor) Analytik Ďurana: Dekarbonizácia ani výdavky na obranu nie sú príčinou slovenského deficitu

Epoch Times Slovensko
19 followers
9 Video Views·Mar 7, 2026
Analytik Radovan Ďurana (INESS) po diskusii v Dome EÚ hovorí o udržateľnosti environmentálnych ambícií a ich financovania v čase meniacej sa hospodárskej a geopolitickej reality, 27. február 2026.
Mr Duran in your opinion are the EU's climate targets economically sustainable within today's macroeconomic context
So high deficits slow growth pressure on social spending
I believe the current situation in Europe is creating some obstacle or challenge to decarbonization
because if Germany does not grow for three years in a row then those additional resources will no longer be available
The resources we need to drive decarbonization are missing
For instance the revenues from land use permits alone reach 40 billion euros
These resources will still be available here next year and there will be funds for them
The question is whether the pace of decarbonization in Germany for example
We see the large-scale production of the chemical industry
A total of 125 000 industrial jobs were lost there last year
I think we'll find out about some changes to emission permits already this summer
which hear the pleas of major companies that met in Antwerp
They are once again urging the European Commission to take action regarding the high energy prices
That is essentially the biggest problem facing the European economy
Electricity prices here are 2.5 times higher than in Slovakia and the United States
Thus the global industry loses that competitive advantage
These costs are typically factored into future projections
We've been missing such precise glimpses into the past
and when it gets fairly complicated because you
have to decide whether the company's investme
stemmed from the need for efficient production
for instance electrification means a overall reduction in energy consumptio
and often a simpler removal
or was carried out due to the necessity of reducing emissions
To be honest in the energy sector that's quite good
but industry it's rather challenging
A significant number of households are either heating their homes or purchasing heat pumps
o reduce energy costs
or because they consider it important to reduce their emissions in this way
Few are counting but we've heard that UHP
is currently working on some kind of analysis
Curious about what they're serving in there
Critics claim the EU is purchasing clean energy production equipment from China
I use it far less myself
China could easily profit from the Union which is becoming dependent on China
Moreover the EU falls further behind in competitiveness
precisely because it supports Chinese companies
What's your reaction
I have no issue with one economy importing goods from another
For me the benefit of globalizing international trade is clear
And if anyone knows how to make it themselves let them do it
The question is whether Europe has moved beyond this area in its development
be aware of other areas where she might find new competitive advantages
a chance to dominate once again
This has long been a persistent issue for the EU namely the availability of capital resources
ax environment 27 different labor laws
These hinder the development of new large firms
the Union needs to eliminate these burdens
From the perspective of public finances it is realistic to fund climate targets
Will the EU's next budget be funded without raising taxes or increasing debt
It's no surprise that the combination of climate regulations and high energy prices
Will relocating industry outside the EU accelerate growth
I'm very curious how the negotiations will ultimately end
the upcoming budget I believe the Union does not need additional resources
In fact current resources need to be used more effectively
It can often be seen in such ineffective usage there
I honestly think the Union shouldn't be setting up new tax companies either
as part of his budget Regarding of course decarbonization
a significant number of companies and individuals have a natural motivation to decarbonize
It's only because that carbon has to be paid for and that carbon isn't free
The second point is that the state obtains 200 to 300 million euros from auctions
What additional resources can you use for this
Alone that's such a paradox—precisely because the high price itself is what makes her solitary
Electricity serves as a driving force for numerous households and businesses alike
o investments in renewable energy sources thereby saving in this way
There are simply no variations there
If were to propose a more realistic model of climate policy
How do you think it would look Fewer regulations more market-based tools
How would that look to you
There would definitely be fewer regulations there since the entire complex
The process of designating or delegating therapists is fairly complicated
Fortunately costs have significantly decreased in recent times
guidelines that actually produce ESG practices thereby significantly reducing
The company will be subject to this regulation
I think that market tools that are pre-orderable
and it is a clear flat rate applied uniformly
a more effective tool than a complex array of numerous objectives
specific and detailed requirements for each method
Final question Do you think it's appropriate that climate expenditures
Should Mali prioritize investments in defense over reducing its debt
That's a political issue I'm an economist so frankly I can't really comment on it
because it is free from political bias
So the fact that Slovakia has a significant deficit is not due to
either by de-carbonization nor by higher defense spending but rather by
an ineffective policy in the field of social transfers
a public administration agency with far too many employees
an inefficient management of funding for healthcare services
Not even decarbonization and I repeat once more not even decarbonization
The Ministry of Defence is not the cause of our deficit Thank
you very much for the interview
